Cabinet ministers to get bigger pensions

Click to enlarge

Pensions are complex and many find them boring. Consequently few people really understand them.

One person who does understand pensions, or at least should, is Francis Maude, Minister for the Cabinet Office, who was previously Managing Director at Morgan Stanley, and whose responsibilities include ministerial pensions.

On 15th March he put a statement in the House of Commons library describing some changes to ministers’ pensions to come into effect on 1st April. Ministers’ contributions to their pension scheme are to increase by an average of 1.7% of salary, lower than the 1.85% rate applied to MPs, although ministers earn more, and significantly below the 2.4% applied to most public sector higher earners.

Extra pension contributions for ministers are tiered, so that that parliamentary under-secretaries, who are paid £23,698 in addition to their MP’s salary, pay 1% more. Ministers of state, who get £33,003 more than an MP, pay 1.6% more. Cabinet ministers, who receive an extra £68,828 and therefore £134,565 in total, pay 2.4% higher pension contributions.

On the face of it that seems fair, with higher earners paying higher increases as elsewhere in the public sector.

However, what Francis Maude does not spell out in his statement is that, under the rules of the ministerial scheme, cabinet ministers, unlike junior minister and other MPs, will receive bigger pensions in return for their higher contributions.

Because of the Maude changes cabinet ministers will now receive a full one-twentieth of an MP’s salary in pension for each year they serve in cabinet. That is because the ministerial pension scheme provides:

“For each year of service as a Minister, the contributions you paid are compared to the contributions that would have been paid by an MP as a member of the MPs’ Section to give a contribution factor … At retirement, all the contribution factors are added together and multiplied by the basic annual salary applying to an MP during the last 12 months of your service as a Minister, to calculate the pension payable.”

Under the Maude changes the ‘contribution factor’ for a cabinet minister rises from 0.956 to 0.995. Cabinet ministers will pay in just £229 more per year than they would under the 1.85% increase for MPs. Yet in return, because of the Maude changes and even if they just serve for one parliament, cabinet ministers get an extra £314 added to their pension every year throughout their retirement.

Highest paid benefit at expense of lower paid

For the country as a whole the Prime Minister and Chancellor are keen for those with the broadest shoulders to make bigger sacrifices so as to lighten the load for those who are paid less. However, there is a different approach nearer home.

Ministers on average will pay less as a proportion of their salary for pensions than do backbench MPs. Meanwhile, under the Maude changes, junior ministers’ pensions are cut to pay for higher cabinet pensions. Ministers of state lose £75 from their pensions, more if they are long-serving, while pensions for parliamentary under-secretaries are cut by £183. This follow cuts to their salaries in 2010 of 14% and 17% respectively, compared to only 9% for cabinet ministers.

Advertisements

8 Comments

Filed under conservatives, Francis Maude, Mark In Westminster, mark reckless, Pensions, rochester and strood

8 responses to “Cabinet ministers to get bigger pensions

  1. me

    Not bad is it being a minister, kiss ass to votes all the while plotting for glory in your constituents downfall when you remove the proverbial rug. Then on top of all that remove free nhs care making it a replica of USA terrible health system where the poor go without vital care and meds.

    But nevermind, poor rich boys who havn’t a clue what living in the real world, you still get your fat pay and fat pensions.
    Nice.
    From a very poor, about to be more poorer, may self immolate in front of any rich boy MP to show what its like living under your rule.

  2. This is going to come across as just another story of robbing the poor to give to the rich.

    Like the 50p income tax thing, which is being justified by the very shallow argument that cutting this tax will boost investment in business and thus growth in the economy.

    There’s no guarantee that this will happen. How can you surmise on how anybody will spend an income tax ‘bonus’?

    A better idea would have been for the Government to have offered this cut in income tax on presentation and acceptance of a business model that showed that the money gained through the cut, would be invested in a sound idea that would lead to a boost in the economy, including more jobs.

    Just an idea.

  3. Stuart

    Now you know how the rest of us feel! And your still better off than most of your constituents

  4. alweekes

    All in this together are we?

    Is it any surprise that voter turnout and young peoples involvement in politics is at such a low?

  5. G. Thompson (PCS REP)

    How can Francis Maude criticise public sector workers striking over pensions when the Government doesnt practice what it preaches? Wealth is flowing upwards away from working people to the very wealthy. The Government should back off from making civil servants, nurses, teachers etc work longer and pay more for a pension of less value.

  6. This is disgusting. At a time when Police Officers, and others in the public sector, are having their pensions ripped up and burnt in front of their eyes. Disgusting. I pay 11%, which will rise to over 14% over the next few years. And for this I am told that I will definitely receive less, and may have to work an extra decade to qualify for it. ‘We are all in this together’ ?

    Well done Mr Reckless for highlighting it.

  7. justin

    Also not forgetting the MP’s have said nothing about changing their length of service like in the public sector. Who must work longer, an MP gets a full pension after 20 years service on top rate 9%. No mention of a 10 year with tapering protection cut off date for existing members in the MP’s scheme. Gold plated pension now becomes a platinum savings plan definitely not in this together.

  8. Pingback: Ministerial Pensions – an open letter to Francis Maude | Mark Reckless MP

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s