Blog: Home Secretary Falls at First Hurdle

4191033926_a88abc6598_bHaving made all manner of promises on Saturday 9th March about taking on Strasbourg and the ECHR, Theresa May returned to her office on Monday 11th March and did the exact opposite. She signed a letter to the Prime Minister, who we can only hope is made of sterner stuff than his Home Secretary, setting out terms for yet another surrender to Strasbourg.

I have been provided with a leaked copy of that letter which I publish below. See also here for my initial response in the Sunday Telegraph.

There are so many mistakes in what the letter states about the law that it is hard to know where to begin, although I expect Dominic Raab to explain to colleagues later. My own impression is that Home Office officials, and particularly its lawyers, have developed a degree of Stockholm syndrome in their relationship with the ECHR.

Any well thought through proposal to rein in the operation of the ECHR in this country, and I believe that Dominic Raab is a far better lawyer than those on whom the Home Secretary relies, is resisted on at best weak and at worst wholly bogus grounds. The Home Office simply seems to have lost the will to fight back against the monstrous human rights culture which has sapped it of the ability to do its job, i.e. protect British citizens from harm.

Download Memo Page 1 – Click Here

Download Memo Page 2 – Click Here

Download Memo Page 3 – Click Here



Filed under Abu Qatada, conservatives, david cameron, Dominic Raab, europe, European Court of Human Rights, Home Affairs Select Committee, Home Office, Human Rights Act, Immigration, mark reckless, Parliament, rochester and strood, theresa may, UKBA

3 responses to “Blog: Home Secretary Falls at First Hurdle

  1. jon

    I can’t believe an intelligent person thinks they can get away with such an appalling argument as Mark Reckless thinks passes for reasoning on the ECHR. To think the man is a lawyer too.

  2. Pingback: The Justice Gap » Blog Archive » Deportations, human rights and the strange case of the Raab amendment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s