Vote to cut green energy costs today

Today the House of Commons votes (in a deferred division between 11.30am and 2pm) on whether to restrict funding to the Green Investment Bank following the Prime Minister’s statement a week ago that we “need to roll back the green charges”.

In Committee on Monday a majority of Conservative backbenchers selected by the whips to consider next steps for the Green Investment Bank voted to restrict its funding. We did this by voting ‘No’ to a ‘Designation’ Order proposed by Vince Cable for the Green Investment Bank to receive government financial assistance.

The minister updated the Committee that “The bank has so far made commitments totalling £714 million into green projects, including projects in each of its four principal priority areas, which are offshore wind, energy efficiency, waste recycling and waste to energy” and that it had previously been proposed “that it will have a total of £3.8 billion of funding for the period to March 2016”.

Bizarrely we learnt that, rather than just being added to electricity bills, £775 million of funding for the Green Investment Bank was to come from track access charges paid by Kent commuters and Eurostar passengers using HS1. We were also concerned to learn that the Bank would have its HQ in Edinburgh but its ‘major transaction team’ would be based in London, similar to the RBS model.

Today’s vote on whether to support this bank financially is unusual since, while Parliament scrutinises tax decisions closely, it usually has little say on spending decisions, with government ‘Estimates’ usually going through without debate and on the nod.

Because of the way the Green Investment Bank is structured, a separate vote in Parliament is needed on whether to ‘Designate’ the Bank for the government to give it financial assistance through what the minister described as “a bespoke power to fund”.

Whether the Liberal Democrats like it or not a ‘No’ vote in the deferred division today could roll back the green levies to get bills down for our constituents



Filed under conservatives, Ed Davey, Energy, lib dems, mark reckless, MP, rochester and strood

5 responses to “Vote to cut green energy costs today

  1. Good luck! The Green Investment Bank is in any case a pointless gesture: given the scale of renewable subsidy available, such projects can all be financed by conventional banks. The jiggery pokery with diverting railway track access charges is exactly the kind of thing that starts happening when government tries to direct economic activity.

  2. This is about the amount that the government see fit to deny in order for all ex-pat pensioners to have their rightful paid for indexing. It would seem that MP’s are still happy to condone discrimination after the 3rd reading of the new Pensions Bill.
    You will be aware of this disgraceful , unacceptable situation Mr Reckless and one wonders why when 96% of pensioners ARE paid the uprating that the 4% are denied without any justification for doing so being offered by DWP when the removal of a government regulation would solve the problem and relieve the stress and poverty that the regulation forces on them with government approval. Despicable treatment you must admit and I was surprised by the Pensions Ministers very negative and poor showing during the scrutiny at the 2nd reading which was a shambles and unworthy of supposed intelligent and responsible people especially Steve Webb whose offhanded attitude was disgraceful.

  3. So what was the result…?

  4. yaosxx

    So what was the reslut…?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s